Friday, July 20, 2007

College Admissions and Discrimination

This is a very interesting and entertaining article on the history of the college admissions process, forwarded to me by a high school classmate. (http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/10/10/051010crat_atlarge)

It discusses how non-objective criteria have been used historically for discriminatory purposes. It starts with a discussion of how Harvard initially relied rather heavily on the College Boards, but backed away when it found it was inadvertently admitting too many Jews. In place of the "objective" test-based criteria, it instituted letters of reference, admissions interviews and complex application processes, weighting highly the features of "desirable" candidates.

The article seems to be arguing for a return to straight rankings for college admissions. I'm not sure I'd totally agree with this approach. It seems to me that the right goal is Diversity in college admissions. Which is not well served by lots of testing. The "Desirable" students that an elitist school wants to screen for often come from families who can afford plenty of test prep.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

While college board exam results have value, they should not be the sole criterion by which students are admitted to an institution, unless a school wants to attract a uniform class of students that perform well on certain types of examinations. The class of test takers may have "Stepford Wives" aura about it.

cw